| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
| |
Update #3254.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Move RTEMS specifics to <rtems/rtems_bsdnet.h>.
Introduce rtems_tap_ifreq. The interface tap support is RTEMS-specific
and only available in the legacy network stack.
Update #2833.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Required by new network stack.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Script does what is expected and tries to do it as
smartly as possible.
+ remove occurrences of two blank comment lines
next to each other after Id string line removed.
+ remove entire comment blocks which only exited to
contain CVS Ids
+ If the processing left a blank line at the top of
a file, it was removed.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
* libcsupport/include/sys/sockio.h: Partial update from
FreeBSD.
|
| |
|
|
| |
all conflicts.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
From: Eric Norum <eric@skatter.usask.ca>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 98 13:20:51 -0600
What do you think of this patch? It implements your `tap'
suggestion in a way that adds support for all ethernet devices with
no driver modifications. I also added a return value from the tap
function. If the return value is zero, the packet will be passed up
the chain as usual. If the return value is non-zero the mbuf holding
the packet will be freed and the packet will be dropped.
If you like it, please submit it to Joel.
I guess there needs to be an addition to the network documentation
describing the additional ioctl's -- and a big warning that the tap
function is called from a context that holds the network semaphore.
Here is Eric's patch. I've tested it a bit, and made a couple of
trivial changes. This is certainly better than mine: it should work
for all Ethernet drivers.
==================================================
The only concern I have about this patch is that the tap function may
want to fiddle with the mbuf, calling functions like m_pullup and the
like. If those force the networking code to rearrange the mbuf
structure, then the caller's call to m_freem may crash. I don't know
if this is a realistic concern--I don't know enough about the mbuf
layer.
|
| |
|
