diff options
author | Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com> | 2010-08-26 20:03:50 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com> | 2010-08-26 20:03:50 +0000 |
commit | 6fe0974bd65fc44b927771e5b9c09cd29d2b7aab (patch) | |
tree | a56643128853979a5520fa109cbcb92abd0b5563 /rtems-coverage | |
parent | 8e770afce8af99ef0f6ba57118aad48aa58ce58b (diff) |
2010-08-26 Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@oarcorp.com>
* Explanations.txt: Remove cases which are now RTEMS_DEBUG.
Diffstat (limited to 'rtems-coverage')
-rw-r--r-- | rtems-coverage/ChangeLog | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | rtems-coverage/Explanations.txt | 32 |
2 files changed, 4 insertions, 32 deletions
diff --git a/rtems-coverage/ChangeLog b/rtems-coverage/ChangeLog index f841252..e163ad1 100644 --- a/rtems-coverage/ChangeLog +++ b/rtems-coverage/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2010-08-26 Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@oarcorp.com> + + * Explanations.txt: Remove cases which are now RTEMS_DEBUG. + 2010-08-09 Bharath Suri <bharath.s.jois@gmail.com> PR 1659/testing diff --git a/rtems-coverage/Explanations.txt b/rtems-coverage/Explanations.txt index 0d891dd..c66f3f2 100644 --- a/rtems-coverage/Explanations.txt +++ b/rtems-coverage/Explanations.txt @@ -158,35 +158,3 @@ rtems_mkdir.c:124 Email Sebastian Sebastian needs to write a test case for this. +++ - -eval.c:95 -Discuss -This, I feel is a valid test unless we have certain guidelines / tests -to be done in the callers. -Or we could have a new test that directly calls the -rtems_filesystem_evaluate_path, if that is OK. -+++ - -eval.c:98 -Discuss -This, I feel is a valid test unless we have certain guidelines / tests -to be done in the callers. -Or we could have a new test that directly calls the -rtems_filesystem_evaluate_path, if that is OK. -+++ - -eval.c:40 -Discuss -This, I feel is a valid test unless we have certain guidelines / tests -to be done in the callers. -Or we could have a new test that directly calls the -rtems_filesystem_evaluate_relative_path, if that is OK. -+++ - -eval.c:43 -Discuss -This, I feel is a valid test unless we have certain guidelines / tests -to be done in the callers. -Or we could have a new test that directly calls the -rtems_filesystem_evaluate_relative_path, if that is OK. -+++ |