diff options
| author | Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de> | 2023-05-05 10:02:34 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de> | 2023-05-09 15:07:09 +0200 |
| commit | 1f00afcb5a5b30593543268acbcbcb94f60d24a2 (patch) | |
| tree | d78dc96223ec34a63cbfdd92e3fc6dc5037f3eac /cpukit/zlib/FAQ | |
| parent | bsps/amd64: add a new EFI-based variant of AMD64 BSP (diff) | |
| download | rtems-1f00afcb5a5b30593543268acbcbcb94f60d24a2.tar.bz2 | |
zlib: Update from 1.2.5 to 1.2.13
The updated files were extracted from:
https://www.zlib.net/zlib-1.2.13.tar.xz
The archive had an SHA-256 hash value of:
d14c38e313afc35a9a8760dadf26042f51ea0f5d154b0630a31da0540107fb98
Close #4902.
Diffstat (limited to 'cpukit/zlib/FAQ')
| -rw-r--r-- | cpukit/zlib/FAQ | 12 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/cpukit/zlib/FAQ b/cpukit/zlib/FAQ index 1a22750a58..99b7cf92e4 100644 --- a/cpukit/zlib/FAQ +++ b/cpukit/zlib/FAQ @@ -44,8 +44,8 @@ The lastest zlib FAQ is at http://zlib.net/zlib_faq.html 6. Where's the zlib documentation (man pages, etc.)? - It's in zlib.h . Examples of zlib usage are in the files example.c and - minigzip.c, with more in examples/ . + It's in zlib.h . Examples of zlib usage are in the files test/example.c + and test/minigzip.c, with more in examples/ . 7. Why don't you use GNU autoconf or libtool or ...? @@ -84,8 +84,10 @@ The lastest zlib FAQ is at http://zlib.net/zlib_faq.html 13. How can I make a Unix shared library? - make clean - ./configure -s + By default a shared (and a static) library is built for Unix. So: + + make distclean + ./configure make 14. How do I install a shared zlib library on Unix? @@ -325,7 +327,7 @@ The lastest zlib FAQ is at http://zlib.net/zlib_faq.html correctly points to the zlib specification in RFC 1950 for the "deflate" transfer encoding, there have been reports of servers and browsers that incorrectly produce or expect raw deflate data per the deflate - specficiation in RFC 1951, most notably Microsoft. So even though the + specification in RFC 1951, most notably Microsoft. So even though the "deflate" transfer encoding using the zlib format would be the more efficient approach (and in fact exactly what the zlib format was designed for), using the "gzip" transfer encoding is probably more reliable due to |