summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/cpukit/score/src/coremsgflush.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de>2015-04-30 13:18:45 +0200
committerSebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de>2015-05-19 12:00:46 +0200
commitc654b52517c2d255aa98eed347edeba60dc854d0 (patch)
tree466a7c9a564b9242b46bed632e0ba6953b140471 /cpukit/score/src/coremsgflush.c
parentscore: Delete Thread_queue_Control::timeout_status (diff)
downloadrtems-c654b52517c2d255aa98eed347edeba60dc854d0.tar.bz2
score: Delete _CORE_message_queue_Flush_support()
Check the number of pending messages in _CORE_message_queue_Flush() to avoid race conditions.
Diffstat (limited to 'cpukit/score/src/coremsgflush.c')
-rw-r--r--cpukit/score/src/coremsgflush.c72
1 files changed, 60 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/cpukit/score/src/coremsgflush.c b/cpukit/score/src/coremsgflush.c
index 51f6c8db98..05683f0327 100644
--- a/cpukit/score/src/coremsgflush.c
+++ b/cpukit/score/src/coremsgflush.c
@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
/**
- * @file
+ * @file
*
- * @brief Flush Pending Messages
- * @ingroup ScoreMessageQueue
+ * @brief Flush Messages Routine
+ *
+ * @ingroup ScoreMessageQueue
*/
/*
@@ -18,19 +19,66 @@
#include "config.h"
#endif
-#include <rtems/system.h>
-#include <rtems/score/chain.h>
-#include <rtems/score/isr.h>
#include <rtems/score/coremsgimpl.h>
-#include <rtems/score/thread.h>
-#include <rtems/score/wkspace.h>
+#include <rtems/score/isr.h>
uint32_t _CORE_message_queue_Flush(
CORE_message_queue_Control *the_message_queue
)
{
- if ( the_message_queue->number_of_pending_messages != 0 )
- return _CORE_message_queue_Flush_support( the_message_queue );
- else
- return 0;
+ ISR_Level level;
+ Chain_Node *inactive_head;
+ Chain_Node *inactive_first;
+ Chain_Node *message_queue_first;
+ Chain_Node *message_queue_last;
+ uint32_t count;
+
+ /*
+ * Currently, RTEMS supports no API that has both flush and blocking
+ * sends. Thus, this routine assumes that there are no senders
+ * blocked waiting to send messages. In the event, that an API is
+ * added that can flush a message queue when threads are blocked
+ * waiting to send, there are two basic behaviors envisioned:
+ *
+ * (1) The thread queue of pending senders is a logical extension
+ * of the pending message queue. In this case, it should be
+ * flushed using the _Thread_queue_Flush() service with a status
+ * such as CORE_MESSAGE_QUEUE_SENDER_FLUSHED (which currently does
+ * not exist). This can be implemented without changing the "big-O"
+ * of the message flushing part of the routine.
+ *
+ * (2) Only the actual messages queued should be purged. In this case,
+ * the blocked sender threads must be allowed to send their messages.
+ * In this case, the implementation will be forced to individually
+ * dequeue the senders and queue their messages. This will force
+ * this routine to have "big O(n)" where n is the number of blocked
+ * senders. If there are more messages pending than senders blocked,
+ * then the existing flush code can be used to dispose of the remaining
+ * pending messages.
+ *
+ * For now, though, we are very happy to have a small routine with
+ * fixed execution time that only deals with pending messages.
+ */
+
+ _ISR_Disable( level );
+
+ count = the_message_queue->number_of_pending_messages;
+ if ( count != 0 ) {
+ the_message_queue->number_of_pending_messages = 0;
+
+ inactive_head = _Chain_Head( &the_message_queue->Inactive_messages );
+ inactive_first = inactive_head->next;
+ message_queue_first = _Chain_First( &the_message_queue->Pending_messages );
+ message_queue_last = _Chain_Last( &the_message_queue->Pending_messages );
+
+ inactive_head->next = message_queue_first;
+ message_queue_last->next = inactive_first;
+ inactive_first->previous = message_queue_last;
+ message_queue_first->previous = inactive_head;
+
+ _Chain_Initialize_empty( &the_message_queue->Pending_messages );
+ }
+
+ _ISR_Enable( level );
+ return count;
}