Removed prototyes for static inline routines and moved the comments into

the inline implementation.   The impetus for this was twofold.  First,
it is incorrect to have static inline prototypes when using the macro
implementation.  Second, this reduced the number of lines in the include
files seen by rtems.h by about 2000 lines.

Next we restricted visibility for the inline routines to inside the
executive itself EXCEPT for a handful of objects.  This reduced the
number of include files included by rtems.h by 40 files and reduced
the lines in the include files seen by rtems.h by about 6000 lines.

In total, these reduced the compile time of the entire RTEMS tree by 20%.
This results in about 8 minutes savings on the SparcStation 10 morgana.

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 24 deletions

diff --git a/cpukit/rtems/include/rtems/rtems/status.h b/cpukit/rtems/include/rtems/rtems/status.h
index 1c00d47bbf..23c1c830c6 100644
--- a/cpukit/rtems/include/rtems/rtems/status.h
+++ b/cpukit/rtems/include/rtems/rtems/status.h
@@ -69,32 +69,9 @@ rtems_status_code _Status_Object_name_errors_to_status[] = {
 #endif
 
 /*
- *  rtems_is_status_successful
- *
- *  DESCRIPTION:
- *
- *  This function returns TRUE if the status code is equal to RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL,
- *  and FALSE otherwise.
+ *  Applications are allowed to use the macros to compare status codes.
  */
 
-STATIC INLINE boolean rtems_is_status_successful (
-  rtems_status_code code
-);
-
-/*
- *  rtems_are_statuses_equal
- *
- *  DESCRIPTION:
- *
- *  This function returns TRUE if the status code1 is equal to code2,
- *  and FALSE otherwise.
- */
-
-STATIC INLINE boolean rtems_are_statuses_equal (
-  rtems_status_code code1,
-  rtems_status_code code2
-);
-
 #include <rtems/rtems/status.inl>
 
 #ifdef __cplusplus