summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/cpukit/posix/src/mutexinit.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com>1999-11-02 17:19:23 +0000
committerJoel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com>1999-11-02 17:19:23 +0000
commit96c041c42ba7cf9489113bb337c8dc9b344f152e (patch)
treebd6b328f8cd3b82963d3b27a05403c6fe11699bb /cpukit/posix/src/mutexinit.c
parentSplit mqueue into multiple files. (diff)
downloadrtems-96c041c42ba7cf9489113bb337c8dc9b344f152e.tar.bz2
Split mutex.c into multiple files.
Diffstat (limited to 'cpukit/posix/src/mutexinit.c')
-rw-r--r--cpukit/posix/src/mutexinit.c180
1 files changed, 180 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/cpukit/posix/src/mutexinit.c b/cpukit/posix/src/mutexinit.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..04c8c8132f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/cpukit/posix/src/mutexinit.c
@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
+/*
+ * $Id$
+ */
+
+#include <assert.h>
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <pthread.h>
+
+#include <rtems/system.h>
+#include <rtems/score/coremutex.h>
+#include <rtems/score/watchdog.h>
+#if defined(RTEMS_MULTIPROCESSING)
+#include <rtems/score/mpci.h>
+#endif
+#include <rtems/posix/mutex.h>
+#include <rtems/posix/priority.h>
+#include <rtems/posix/time.h>
+
+/*PAGE
+ *
+ * 11.3.2 Initializing and Destroying a Mutex, P1003.1c/Draft 10, p. 87
+ *
+ * NOTE: XXX Could be optimized so all the attribute error checking
+ * is not performed when attr is NULL.
+ */
+
+int pthread_mutex_init(
+ pthread_mutex_t *mutex,
+ const pthread_mutexattr_t *attr
+)
+{
+ POSIX_Mutex_Control *the_mutex;
+ CORE_mutex_Attributes *the_mutex_attr;
+ const pthread_mutexattr_t *the_attr;
+ CORE_mutex_Disciplines the_discipline;
+#if 0
+ register POSIX_Mutex_Control *mutex_in_use;
+ Objects_Locations location;
+#endif
+
+ if ( attr ) the_attr = attr;
+ else the_attr = &_POSIX_Mutex_Default_attributes;
+
+ /* Check for NULL mutex */
+
+ if ( !mutex )
+ return EINVAL;
+
+ /*
+ * This code should eventually be removed.
+ *
+ * Although the POSIX specification says:
+ *
+ * "Attempting to initialize an already initialized mutex results
+ * in undefined behavior."
+ *
+ * Trying to keep the caller from doing the create when *mutex
+ * is actually a valid ID causes grief. All it takes is the wrong
+ * value in an uninitialized variable to make this fail. As best
+ * I can tell, RTEMS was the only pthread implementation to choose
+ * this option for "undefined behavior" and doing so has created
+ * portability problems. In particular, Rosimildo DaSilva
+ * <rdasilva@connecttel.com> saw seemingly random failures in the
+ * RTEMS port of omniORB2 when this code was enabled.
+ *
+ * Joel Sherrill <joel@OARcorp.com> 14 May 1999
+ */
+
+
+#if 0
+ /* avoid infinite recursion on call to this routine in _POSIX_Mutex_Get */
+
+ if ( *mutex != PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER ) {
+
+ /* EBUSY if *mutex is a valid id */
+
+ mutex_in_use = _POSIX_Mutex_Get( mutex, &location );
+ switch ( location ) {
+ case OBJECTS_REMOTE:
+ case OBJECTS_ERROR:
+ break;
+ case OBJECTS_LOCAL:
+ _Thread_Enable_dispatch();
+ return EBUSY;
+ }
+ }
+#endif
+
+ if ( !the_attr->is_initialized )
+ return EINVAL;
+
+ /*
+ * XXX: Be careful about attributes when global!!!
+ */
+
+ assert( the_attr->process_shared == PTHREAD_PROCESS_PRIVATE );
+
+#if defined(RTEMS_MULTIPROCESSING)
+ if ( the_attr->process_shared == PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED )
+ return POSIX_MP_NOT_IMPLEMENTED();
+#endif
+
+ /*
+ * Determine the discipline of the mutex
+ */
+
+ switch ( the_attr->protocol ) {
+ case PTHREAD_PRIO_NONE:
+ the_discipline = CORE_MUTEX_DISCIPLINES_FIFO;
+ break;
+ case PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT:
+ the_discipline = CORE_MUTEX_DISCIPLINES_PRIORITY_INHERIT;
+ break;
+ case PTHREAD_PRIO_PROTECT:
+ the_discipline = CORE_MUTEX_DISCIPLINES_PRIORITY_CEILING;
+ break;
+ default:
+ return EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if ( !_POSIX_Priority_Is_valid( the_attr->prio_ceiling ) )
+ return EINVAL;
+
+ _Thread_Disable_dispatch();
+
+ the_mutex = _POSIX_Mutex_Allocate();
+
+ if ( !the_mutex ) {
+ _Thread_Enable_dispatch();
+ return EAGAIN;
+ }
+
+#if defined(RTEMS_MULTIPROCESSING)
+ if ( the_attr->process_shared == PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED &&
+ !( _Objects_MP_Allocate_and_open( &_POSIX_Mutex_Information, 0,
+ the_mutex->Object.id, FALSE ) ) ) {
+ _POSIX_Mutex_Free( the_mutex );
+ _Thread_Enable_dispatch();
+ return EAGAIN;
+ }
+#endif
+
+ the_mutex->process_shared = the_attr->process_shared;
+
+ the_mutex_attr = &the_mutex->Mutex.Attributes;
+
+ the_mutex_attr->allow_nesting = the_attr->recursive;
+ the_mutex_attr->priority_ceiling =
+ _POSIX_Priority_To_core( the_attr->prio_ceiling );
+ the_mutex_attr->discipline = the_discipline;
+
+ /*
+ * Must be initialized to unlocked.
+ */
+
+ _CORE_mutex_Initialize(
+ &the_mutex->Mutex,
+ OBJECTS_POSIX_MUTEXES,
+ the_mutex_attr,
+ CORE_MUTEX_UNLOCKED,
+ NULL /* proxy_extract_callout */
+ );
+
+ _Objects_Open( &_POSIX_Mutex_Information, &the_mutex->Object, 0 );
+
+ *mutex = the_mutex->Object.id;
+
+#if defined(RTEMS_MULTIPROCESSING)
+ if ( the_attr->process_shared == PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED )
+ _POSIX_Mutex_MP_Send_process_packet(
+ POSIX_MUTEX_MP_ANNOUNCE_CREATE,
+ the_mutex->Object.id,
+ 0, /* Name not used */
+ 0 /* Not used */
+ );
+#endif
+
+ _Thread_Enable_dispatch();
+ return 0;
+}