posix: Create priority implementation header

Move implementation specific parts of priority.h and priority.inl into
new header file priorityimpl.h.  Remove priority.h since there is no
application visible API.

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 108 deletions

diff --git a/cpukit/posix/include/rtems/posix/priority.h b/cpukit/posix/include/rtems/posix/priority.h
deleted file mode 100644
index e9ee2f900b..0000000000
--- a/cpukit/posix/include/rtems/posix/priority.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,108 +0,0 @@
-/**
- * @file
- * 
- * @brief POSIX Priority Support
- *
- * This include file defines the interface to the POSIX priority
- * implementation.
- */
-
-/*
- *  COPYRIGHT (c) 1989-2011.
- *  On-Line Applications Research Corporation (OAR).
- *
- *  The license and distribution terms for this file may be
- *  found in the file LICENSE in this distribution or at
- *  http://www.rtems.com/license/LICENSE.
- */
-
-#ifndef _RTEMS_POSIX_PRIORITY_H
-#define _RTEMS_POSIX_PRIORITY_H
-
-/**
- * @defgroup POSIX_PRIORITY POSIX Priority Support
- *
- * @ingroup POSIXAPI
- *
- * @brief Interface to the POSIX Priority Implementation
- * 
- */
-/**@{**/
-
-#include <rtems/score/priority.h>
-
-/**
- * 1003.1b-1993,2.2.2.80 definition of priority, p. 19
- *
- * "Numerically higher values represent higher priorities."
- *
- * Thus, RTEMS Core has priorities run in the opposite sense of the POSIX API.
- *
- * There are only 254 posix priority levels since a task at priority level
- * 255 would never run because of the RTEMS idle task.  This is necessary
- * because GNAT maps the lowest Ada task priority to the lowest thread
- * priority.  The lowest priority Ada task should get to run, so there is
- * a fundamental conflict with having 255 priorities.
- *
- * But since RTEMS can be configured with fewer than 256 priorities,
- * we use the internal constant.
- */
-#define POSIX_SCHEDULER_MAXIMUM_PRIORITY (PRIORITY_MAXIMUM - 1)
-
-
-/**
- *  This is the numerically least important POSIX priority.
- */
-#define POSIX_SCHEDULER_MINIMUM_PRIORITY (1)
-
-/**
- * @brief Check if POSIX priority is valid.
- * 
- * 1003.1b-1993,2.2.2.80 definition of priority, p. 19
- *
- * "Numerically higher values represent higher priorities."
- *
- * Thus, RTEMS Core has priorities run in the opposite sense of the POSIX API.
- *
- * @param[in] priority is the priority to test
- *
- * @retval TRUE The priority is valid.
- * @retval FALSE The priority is invalid.
- */
-bool _POSIX_Priority_Is_valid(
-  int priority
-);
-
-/**
- * @brief Convert POSIX priority to SuperCore priority.
- *
- * This method converts a POSIX API priority into onto the corresponding
- * SuperCore value.
- *
- * @param[in] priority is the POSIX API priority.
- *
- * @return This method returns the corresponding SuperCore priority.
- */
-RTEMS_INLINE_ROUTINE Priority_Control _POSIX_Priority_To_core(
-  int priority
-);
-
-/**
- * @brief Convert SuperCore priority To POSIX priority.
- *
- * This method converts a SuperCore priority into onto the corresponding
- * POSIX API value.
- *
- * @param[in] priority is the POSIX API priority.
- *
- * @return This method returns the corresponding POSIX priority.
- */
-RTEMS_INLINE_ROUTINE int _POSIX_Priority_From_core(
-  Priority_Control priority
-);
-
-#include <rtems/posix/priority.inl>
-
-/** @} */
-
-#endif