From b2dbb634eccc4132eb839a0ed5ab09c7b3bd992e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 11:36:23 +0200
Subject: score: Remove CPU_set_Control

Use Processor_mask instead.

Update #2514.
---
 testsuites/sptests/spsysinit01/init.c | 13 -------------
 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)

(limited to 'testsuites')

diff --git a/testsuites/sptests/spsysinit01/init.c b/testsuites/sptests/spsysinit01/init.c
index f6fa1ddaf4..f3e0e3f6a5 100644
--- a/testsuites/sptests/spsysinit01/init.c
+++ b/testsuites/sptests/spsysinit01/init.c
@@ -72,8 +72,6 @@ typedef enum {
   INITIAL_EXTENSIONS_POST,
   DATA_STRUCTURES_PRE,
   DATA_STRUCTURES_POST,
-  CPU_SET_PRE,
-  CPU_SET_POST,
   USER_EXTENSIONS_PRE,
   USER_EXTENSIONS_POST,
   CLASSIC_TASKS_PRE,
@@ -245,17 +243,6 @@ LAST(RTEMS_SYSINIT_DATA_STRUCTURES)
   next_step(DATA_STRUCTURES_POST);
 }
 
-FIRST(RTEMS_SYSINIT_CPU_SET)
-{
-  /* There is nothing to do in case RTEMS_SMP is not defined */
-  next_step(CPU_SET_PRE);
-}
-
-LAST(RTEMS_SYSINIT_CPU_SET)
-{
-  next_step(CPU_SET_POST);
-}
-
 FIRST(RTEMS_SYSINIT_USER_EXTENSIONS)
 {
   assert(_Extension_Information.maximum == 0);
-- 
cgit v1.2.3