From 7189a402975bde885bf500e46ddaa3770be512ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joel Sherrill Date: Wed, 5 Jun 1996 14:44:03 +0000 Subject: added comments to to document the definition of posix priority and how it corresponds to rtems core priority. --- cpukit/posix/inline/rtems/posix/priority.inl | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) (limited to 'cpukit/posix/inline') diff --git a/cpukit/posix/inline/rtems/posix/priority.inl b/cpukit/posix/inline/rtems/posix/priority.inl index c3798ea3a8..7c6e940378 100644 --- a/cpukit/posix/inline/rtems/posix/priority.inl +++ b/cpukit/posix/inline/rtems/posix/priority.inl @@ -5,6 +5,14 @@ #ifndef __RTEMS_POSIX_PRIORITY_inl #define __RTEMS_POSIX_PRIORITY_inl +/* + * 1003.1b-1993,2.2.2.80 definition of priority, p. 19 + * + * "Numericallly higher values represent higher priorities." + * + * Thus, RTEMS Core has priorities run in the opposite sense of the POSIX API. + */ + STATIC INLINE boolean _POSIX_Priority_Is_valid( int priority ) -- cgit v1.2.3