From 2ca64b55eadffbfcc821881dca04680cbb516bb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 02:32:47 +0000
Subject: New ideas on test incorporated.

---
 c/src/tests/sptests/sp27/TODO | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

(limited to 'c')

diff --git a/c/src/tests/sptests/sp27/TODO b/c/src/tests/sptests/sp27/TODO
index fd4e98a78e..6602ad252b 100644
--- a/c/src/tests/sptests/sp27/TODO
+++ b/c/src/tests/sptests/sp27/TODO
@@ -2,18 +2,26 @@
 #  $Id$
 #
 
-This test should be for rtems_semaphore_flush.  It will be something like:
+This test will be for rtems_semaphore_flush once it is written.  
+
+To avoid scheduling problems in the printout, it would be better to
+have the test program:
+
+volatile int bFlag, cFlag;
 
 TaskA:
-        create semaphore with initial count 0
-        start taskB and TaskC (Higher priority than taskA, no round-robin)
-        print message
-        semaphore_flush
+         create semaphore with initial count 0
+         start taskB and TaskC (Higher priority than taskA, no
+round-robin)
+         print bFlag, cFlag (should both be 0)
+         semaphore_flush
+         print bFlag, cFlag (should both be 1)
 
-TaskB/C:
-        obtain semaphore
-        print message
-        suspend/delete self
+ TaskB/C:
+         obtain semaphore
+         set flag (B or C as appropriate)
+         suspend/delete self
 
 Successful test would show message from both tasks B and C after the
 message from task A.
+
-- 
cgit v1.2.3