From 063a19a2909c7a3d31c2af410d01e3fd6f0100c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joel Sherrill Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 00:24:30 +0000 Subject: Moved around per Ralf Corsepius as preparation for automake --- c/src/exec/posix/headers/priority.h | 44 ------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 44 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 c/src/exec/posix/headers/priority.h (limited to 'c/src/exec/posix/headers/priority.h') diff --git a/c/src/exec/posix/headers/priority.h b/c/src/exec/posix/headers/priority.h deleted file mode 100644 index c0253f3bab..0000000000 --- a/c/src/exec/posix/headers/priority.h +++ /dev/null @@ -1,44 +0,0 @@ -/* - * - * - * $Id$ - */ - -#ifndef __RTEMS_POSIX_PRIORITY_h -#define __RTEMS_POSIX_PRIORITY_h - -#include - -/* - * 1003.1b-1993,2.2.2.80 definition of priority, p. 19 - * - * "Numericallly higher values represent higher priorities." - * - * Thus, RTEMS Core has priorities run in the opposite sense of the POSIX API. - * - * There are only 254 posix priority levels since a task at priority level - * 255 would never run because of the RTEMS idle task. This is necessary - * because GNAT maps the lowest Ada task priority to the lowest thread - * priority. The lowest priority Ada task should get to run, so there is - * a fundamental conflict with having 255 priorities. - */ - -#define POSIX_SCHEDULER_MAXIMUM_PRIORITY (254) - -#define POSIX_SCHEDULER_MINIMUM_PRIORITY (1) - -RTEMS_INLINE_ROUTINE boolean _POSIX_Priority_Is_valid( - int priority -); - -RTEMS_INLINE_ROUTINE Priority_Control _POSIX_Priority_To_core( - int priority -); - -RTEMS_INLINE_ROUTINE int _POSIX_Priority_From_core( - Priority_Control priority -); - -#include - -#endif -- cgit v1.2.3