From f641b15e18a2fa8acbf0ae8a17c8a9a08b895515 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joel Sherrill Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:39:41 -0500 Subject: Revert: rtems-rfs-buffer.c: Correct printf() format specifiers to eliminate warnings This may actually be a problem in inttypes.h. --- cpukit/libfs/src/rfs/rtems-rfs-buffer.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/libfs/src/rfs/rtems-rfs-buffer.c b/cpukit/libfs/src/rfs/rtems-rfs-buffer.c index 4192b21789..3d89f5fa43 100644 --- a/cpukit/libfs/src/rfs/rtems-rfs-buffer.c +++ b/cpukit/libfs/src/rfs/rtems-rfs-buffer.c @@ -52,12 +52,13 @@ rtems_rfs_scan_chain (rtems_chain_control* chain, buffer = (rtems_rfs_buffer*) node; if (rtems_rfs_trace (RTEMS_RFS_TRACE_BUFFER_CHAINS)) - printf ("%p ", buffer->user); + printf ("%" PRIuPTR " ", ((intptr_t) buffer->user)); if (((rtems_rfs_buffer_block) ((intptr_t)(buffer->user))) == block) { if (rtems_rfs_trace (RTEMS_RFS_TRACE_BUFFER_CHAINS)) - printf (": found block=%p\n", buffer->user); + printf (": found block=%" PRIuPTR "\n", + ((intptr_t)(buffer->user))); (*count)--; rtems_chain_extract_unprotected (node); -- cgit v1.2.3