From 4edf348c3395560bcaaf3c020968e427f5683d28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastian Huber Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 09:31:13 +0200 Subject: score: PR2179: Fix initially locked PCP mutexes Elevate the priority of the creating task to the ceiling priority in case a semaphore is created as initially locked. --- cpukit/score/src/coremutex.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- testsuites/sptests/sp65/init.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ testsuites/sptests/sp65/sp65.doc | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/score/src/coremutex.c b/cpukit/score/src/coremutex.c index 96b11c9cd1..e13c7aafac 100644 --- a/cpukit/score/src/coremutex.c +++ b/cpukit/score/src/coremutex.c @@ -43,10 +43,20 @@ CORE_mutex_Status _CORE_mutex_Initialize( the_mutex->holder = executing; if ( _CORE_mutex_Is_inherit_priority( &the_mutex->Attributes ) || _CORE_mutex_Is_priority_ceiling( &the_mutex->Attributes ) ) { + Priority_Control ceiling = the_mutex->Attributes.priority_ceiling; + + /* + * The mutex initialization is only protected by the allocator lock in + * general. Disable thread dispatching before the priority check to + * prevent interference with priority inheritance. + */ + _Thread_Disable_dispatch(); + + if ( executing->current_priority < ceiling ) { + _Thread_Enable_dispatch(); + return CORE_MUTEX_STATUS_CEILING_VIOLATED; + } - if ( executing->current_priority < - the_mutex->Attributes.priority_ceiling ) - return CORE_MUTEX_STATUS_CEILING_VIOLATED; #ifdef __RTEMS_STRICT_ORDER_MUTEX__ _Chain_Prepend_unprotected( &executing->lock_mutex, &the_mutex->queue.lock_queue ); @@ -54,6 +64,9 @@ CORE_mutex_Status _CORE_mutex_Initialize( #endif executing->resource_count++; + + _Thread_Change_priority( executing, ceiling, false ); + _Thread_Enable_dispatch(); } } else { the_mutex->nest_count = 0; diff --git a/testsuites/sptests/sp65/init.c b/testsuites/sptests/sp65/init.c index cba836d422..7c6d8d3bef 100644 --- a/testsuites/sptests/sp65/init.c +++ b/testsuites/sptests/sp65/init.c @@ -28,6 +28,17 @@ rtems_task Task_1(rtems_task_argument arg); #define TASK_PRIORITY 1 #endif +static void assert_priority(rtems_task_priority expected) +{ + rtems_status_code sc; + rtems_task_priority prio; + + sc = rtems_task_set_priority(RTEMS_SELF, RTEMS_CURRENT_PRIORITY, &prio); + rtems_test_assert(sc == RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL); + + rtems_test_assert(prio == expected); +} + rtems_task Init( rtems_task_argument ignored ) @@ -37,6 +48,30 @@ rtems_task Init( TEST_BEGIN(); + /* + * Verify that an initially locked priority ceiling mutex elevates the + * priority of the creating task. + */ + + status = rtems_semaphore_create( + rtems_build_name( 's','e','m','1' ), + 0, + RTEMS_BINARY_SEMAPHORE | RTEMS_PRIORITY | RTEMS_PRIORITY_CEILING, + 1, + &Mutex_id + ); + rtems_test_assert(status == RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL); + + assert_priority(1); + + status = rtems_semaphore_release(Mutex_id); + rtems_test_assert(status == RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL); + + assert_priority(TASK_PRIORITY); + + status = rtems_semaphore_delete(Mutex_id); + rtems_test_assert(status == RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL); + /* * Create binary semaphore (a.k.a. Mutex) with Priority Ceiling * attribute. diff --git a/testsuites/sptests/sp65/sp65.doc b/testsuites/sptests/sp65/sp65.doc index 73786eefc9..854dedeb07 100644 --- a/testsuites/sptests/sp65/sp65.doc +++ b/testsuites/sptests/sp65/sp65.doc @@ -23,3 +23,5 @@ concepts: + Verify the priority ceiling mutex getting released which results in a thread being unblocked and the unblocked thread's priority being elevated. ++ Verify that an initially locked priority ceiling mutex elevates the priority + of the creating task. -- cgit v1.2.3