summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/atomic.h (unfollow)
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-01-25Remove make preinstallChris Johns1-156/+0
A speciality of the RTEMS build system was the make preinstall step. It copied header files from arbitrary locations into the build tree. The header files were included via the -Bsome/build/tree/path GCC command line option. This has at least seven problems: * The make preinstall step itself needs time and disk space. * Errors in header files show up in the build tree copy. This makes it hard for editors to open the right file to fix the error. * There is no clear relationship between source and build tree header files. This makes an audit of the build process difficult. * The visibility of all header files in the build tree makes it difficult to enforce API barriers. For example it is discouraged to use BSP-specifics in the cpukit. * An introduction of a new build system is difficult. * Include paths specified by the -B option are system headers. This may suppress warnings. * The parallel build had sporadic failures on some hosts. This patch removes the make preinstall step. All installed header files are moved to dedicated include directories in the source tree. Let @RTEMS_CPU@ be the target architecture, e.g. arm, powerpc, sparc, etc. Let @RTEMS_BSP_FAMILIY@ be a BSP family base directory, e.g. erc32, imx, qoriq, etc. The new cpukit include directories are: * cpukit/include * cpukit/score/cpu/@RTEMS_CPU@/include * cpukit/libnetworking The new BSP include directories are: * bsps/include * bsps/@RTEMS_CPU@/include * bsps/@RTEMS_CPU@/@RTEMS_BSP_FAMILIY@/include There are build tree include directories for generated files. The include directory order favours the most general header file, e.g. it is not possible to override general header files via the include path order. The "bootstrap -p" option was removed. The new "bootstrap -H" option should be used to regenerate the "headers.am" files. Update #3254.
2015-09-26score: Use uintptr_t for atomic pointer operationsSebastian Huber1-20/+20
Do not obfuscate the standard API.
2015-03-06score: Fix SMP lock implementationSebastian Huber1-0/+2
See also: https://nahratzah.wordpress.com/2012/10/12/a-trivial-fair-spinlock/ http://concurrencyfreaks.blogspot.de/2014/05/relaxed-atomics-optimizations-for.html
2015-02-19score: Make <rtems/score/atomic.h> availableSebastian Huber1-0/+2
Make <rtems/score/atomic.h> available for all RTEMS configurations. Use inline functions instead of macros. Use ISR disable/enable on uni-processor configurations to ensure atomicity. Update #2273.
2014-06-30score: Workaround for GCC 4.9 for atomic opsSebastian Huber1-384/+117
The GCC 4.9 ships its own <stdatomic.h> which is not C++ compatible. The suggested solution was to include <atomic> in case C++ is used. This works at least with GCC 4.9. See also: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60932 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60940
2014-03-21Change all references of rtems.com to rtems.org.Chris Johns1-1/+1
2014-03-06score: Add _Atomic_Fence()Sebastian Huber1-0/+7
2014-02-14score: Add Atomic_UintSebastian Huber1-0/+83
2013-09-03score: Use void * for some atomic pointer opsSebastian Huber1-12/+12
2013-09-03score: Use unsigned long for atomic integersSebastian Huber1-37/+37
Use unsigned long instead of uint_fast32_t since C11 provides only a ATOMIC_LONG_LOCK_FREE macro constant. This makes it also possible to use properly typed integer literals like 123UL. It is now clear which compatible type should be used for the atomic integer.
2013-08-28score: Atomic flag changesSebastian Huber1-25/+21
Delete _Atomic_Init_flag(). Change ATOMIC_INITIALIZER_FLAG into a constant. Rename _Atomic_Clear_flag() to _Atomic_Flag_clear(). Rename _Atomic_Test_set_flag() to _Atomic_Flag_test_and_set(). This is now in line with the C11 schema.
2013-08-28score: Use static inline directlySebastian Huber1-21/+21
This file uses already C11 features. Include proper header file.
2013-08-28add atomic init functionWeiY1-0/+37
2013-08-06correct comments about atomic apiWeiY1-5/+5
2013-07-17New atomic API definition based on C11 atomicWeiY1-213/+232
2013-02-07score: atomic support for RTEMS. Generic atomic operations API definition.WeiY1-0/+277