| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Use common phrases for the file brief descriptions.
Update #3706.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use the following variant which was already used by most source files:
#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
#include "config.h"
#endif
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Avoid dead code in non-SMP configurations. Return scheduler identifier
independent of the current processor count of the scheduler via
rtems_scheduler_ident(), since this value may change during run-time.
Check the processor count in _Scheduler_Set() under scheduler lock
protection.
Update #2797.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Introduce Thread_queue_Lock_context to contain the context necessary for
thread queue lock and thread wait lock acquire/release operations to
reduce the Thread_Control size.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The _Thread_Lock_acquire() function had a potentially infinite run-time
due to the lack of fairness at atomic operations level.
Update #2412.
Update #2556.
Update #2765.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Task priorities are only valid within a scheduler instance. The
rtems_task_set_scheduler() directive moves a task from one scheduler
instance to another using the current priority of the thread. However,
the current task priority of the source scheduler instance is undefined
in the target scheduler instance. Add a third parameter to specify the
priority.
Close #2749.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Uniformly use *_Get() to get an object by identifier with a lock
context.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Update #2555.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The current implementation of task migration in RTEMS has some
implications with respect to the interrupt latency. It is crucial to
preserve the system invariant that a task can execute on at most one
processor in the system at a time. This is accomplished with a boolean
indicator in the task context. The processor architecture specific
low-level task context switch code will mark that a task context is no
longer executing and waits that the heir context stopped execution
before it restores the heir context and resumes execution of the heir
task. So there is one point in time in which a processor is without a
task. This is essential to avoid cyclic dependencies in case multiple
tasks migrate at once. Otherwise some supervising entity is necessary to
prevent life-locks. Such a global supervisor would lead to scalability
problems so this approach is not used. Currently the thread dispatch is
performed with interrupts disabled. So in case the heir task is
currently executing on another processor then this prolongs the time of
disabled interrupts since one processor has to wait for another
processor to make progress.
It is difficult to avoid this issue with the interrupt latency since
interrupts normally store the context of the interrupted task on its
stack. In case a task is marked as not executing we must not use its
task stack to store such an interrupt context. We cannot use the heir
stack before it stopped execution on another processor. So if we enable
interrupts during this transition we have to provide an alternative task
independent stack for this time frame. This issue needs further
investigation.
|
| |
|
