summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/cpukit/libnetworking/netinet/ip_input.c (unfollow)
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2007-03-29Further _IP_VHL removal preps.Ralf Corsepius1-1/+1
2007-03-29Preps to eliminate _IP_VHL (Abandoned in FreeBSD). Misc mergers from ↵Ralf Corsepius1-20/+54
upstream FreeBSD.
2007-03-282007-03-28 Ralf Corsépius <ralf.corsepius@rtems.org>Ralf Corsepius1-10/+11
* libnetworking/netinet/ip_input.c: Eliminate __P(). Change "int next" to "int32_t next" for 16bit targets.
2006-12-08Cosmetics from FreeBSD.Ralf Corsepius1-19/+13
2002-10-042002-10-04 Jay Monkman <jtm@smoothsmoothie.com>Joel Sherrill1-1/+1
* netinet/in_cksum.c, netinet/ip_icmp.h, netinet/ip_input.c, netinet/tcp_input.c, netinet/tcp_subr.c, netinet/tcp_var.h, sys/queue.h: Address alignment requirements for the ARM.
1999-10-25Patch from Eric Norum <eric@cls.usask.ca> to address the following problemJoel Sherrill1-1/+1
report from Philip A. Prindeville <philipp@zembu.com>: I was working on a device driver for a certain ethernet chipset that occassionally wraps in its buffer, and causes a resulting mbuf chain with only a few dozen bytes in the first mbuf of the chain. I wouldn't have thought this would be a problem, until I ran some stress tests that flooded the ethernet receiver with packets and started to get panics here: 250 251 if (m->m_pkthdr.len < sizeof(struct ip)) 252 goto tooshort; 253 254 #ifdef DIAGNOSTIC 255 if (m->m_len < sizeof(struct ip)) 256 panic("ipintr mbuf too short"); 257 #endif 258 259 if (m->m_len < sizeof (struct ip) && 260 (m = m_pullup(m, sizeof (struct ip))) == 0) { 261 ipstat.ips_toosmall++; 262 return; 263 } 264 ip = mtod(m, struct ip *); and the panic was at line 256. But if I #undef'd DIAGNOSTICS, then the m_pullup() at line 260 does the right thing and the packet ends up being processed just fine. So I started wondering, (a) why was the test checking for something that apparently wasn't a fatal condition but rather one that is subsequently recovered from a couple of lines later and (b) why panic as a diagnostic "aid" from a recoverable condition rather than just (say) log a message to the console? All of this seems overly severe for no reason that is readily apparent to me.
1998-08-21All warnings removed.Joel Sherrill1-1/+1
1998-08-19Base filesJoel Sherrill1-0/+1488