| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
a BSP (c4xsim) supporting the simulator included with gdb. This port
was done by Joel Sherrill and Jennifer Averett of OAR Corporation.
Also included with this port is a space/time optimization to eliminate
FP context switch management on CPUs without hardware or software FP.
An issue with this port was that sizeof(unsigned32) = sizeof(unsigned8)
on this CPU. This required addressing alignment checks and assumptions
as well as fixing code that assumed sizeof(unsigned32) == 4.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
if the mutex is successfully obtained.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
that breaks when the target has 16 bit address space. One of the H8
multilibs is a 16-bit address space CPU. When a real attempt is
made to support this CPU model, the code that assumes an address
is 32 bits will have to change. This constant is probably not
flagging all impacted code.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
adds .cvsignore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
blocking sends when the queue is full. The SuperCore was enhanced
to support blocking on send. The existing POSIX API was debugged
and numerous test cases were added to psxmsgq01 by Jennifer Averett.
SuperCore enhancements and resulting modifications to other APIs
were done by Joel.
There is one significant point of interpretation for the POSIX API.
What happens to threads already blocked on a message queue when the
mode of that same message queue is changed from blocking to non-blocking?
We decided to unblock all waiting tasks with an EAGAIN error just
as if a non-blocking version of the same operation had returned
unsatisfied. This case is not discussed in the POSIX standard and
other implementations may have chosen differently.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
power binary/mutex style semaphores already supported by RTEMS. This
was done at the request of Eric Norum <eric@cls.usask.ca> in support
of his effort to port EPICS to RTEMS. This change consisted of
changing the nesting_allowed boolean into a lock_nesting_behavior
enumerated value as well as allowing the core mutex object to optionally
support ensuring that the holder of a binary semaphore released it.
Finally, a more subtle enhancement was to allow the non-holder to release
a priority inheritance/ceiling mutex and still allow the holding task
to return to its original priority.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to convert the libc directory to automake and "dozens of
small fixes for Makefile.ins/configure.ins below c/src/lib."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
.. a major configuration cleanup
... major enhancement of automake support.
... and it contains a *major* breakthough:
Automake support for libchip and libmisc *LEAF* directories.
To implement this I have used several nasty tricks
* The basical trick is to wrap an old Makefile.in's contents into a
Makefile.am and still continue to use (i.e include) the old
*.cfg files.
* Replaced each INSTALL_IF_CHANGE and INSTALL_VARIANT with make
dependencies
* Add a gnu-make ifdef AUTOMAKE to main.cfg to avoid conflicts between
automake and RTEMS make rules
* Replaced each install:: and preinstall:: rule with make dependencies
* Replaced SUB_DIRS with SUBDIRS in all Makefile.ins (Automake
convention)
* Removed each manually added autoconf substitution which automake
performs automatically.
This is not yet full automake support, because using the temporary
installation directory, preinstallation in general and building variants
are in contradiction to automake's basic working principles ...
... the new Makefile.ams work still somewhat clumsy
... nevertheless they work (quite well).
WARNING:
At first glance this patch is small, but
* it affects the whole configuration system.
* it opens the road to introducing automake to all Makefile.ins
currently not being under automake control.
JOEL> Does this remove or add any files?
Both, all Makefile.ins below libchip and libmisc get replaced with
Makefile.ams.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
its name in the name_table. This was required by the POSIX semaphore
and message queue managers which support a concept of open, close, and
unlink. The object becomes "invisible" to further opens following an
unlink but all open sessions remain active until they are closed. This
requires that the removal of an object ID be separate from the removal
of its name.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Working Group. Included are tests.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
where wrapup left pieces out of the librtemsall.a.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ralf Corsepius <corsepiu@faw.uni-ulm.de> which converted many
Makefile.in's to Makefile.am's. This added a lot of files.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The main topic is replacing the hard-coded values for HAS_MP and
HAS_RDBG in custom/*.cfg with per-bsp configuration-time autoconf checks
(This is the patch I had mentioned before earlier this week).
CHANGES
* HAS_MP removed from custom/*.cfg, replaced with configuration time
autoconf check
* HAS_RDBG removed from custom/*.cfg, replaced with configuration-time
autoconf check
* NEW: c/src/make/bsp.cfg.in, takes configuration-time checked per-bsp
values (i.e. HAS_MP, HAS_RDBG), gets installed as
$(prefix)/<bsp>/make/bsp.cfg
* NEW: default.cfg includes bsp.cfg - this change is backward
compatible.
* IMPORT_SRC: apply VPATH instead for ts_386ex/i386ex subdirectory
Makefile.ins
* HACK: a bug in acpolish mis-handles addtions to makefile variables
which are enclosed in gmake conditionals:
c/src/lib/libbsp/m68k/ods68302/start302/Makefile.in
* Apply inline_dir, HAS_MP and HAS_RDBG for avoiding configuration of
unneeded subdirectories in various configure.in files.
* Several minor changes in Makefile.ins and configure.ins, wrt. to the
order of including *.cfg and defining Makefile variables
APPLYING THE PATCH:
patch -p1 < rtems-rc-19990709-4.diff
./autogen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A bug in acpolish made it into rtems-rc-19990709-0.diff, which
unfortunately affects all Makefile.ins:
* The maintainer mode conditional was erroniously applied to the
dependencies of "Makefile".
In case you already checked in rtems-rc-19990709-0.diff to CVS you have
to check in all Makefile.ins again after applying the patch below :).
Please apply the patch below as follows:
patch -p1 < rtems-rc-19990709-1.diff
tools/update/rtems-polish.sh -ac
Note: There is no need to rerun your tests if you have used
--enable-maintainer-mode to configure RTEMS, because this patch converts
all Makefile.ins to the same settings as used for
--enable-maintainer-mode.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to move RTEMS more to automake/autoconf and GNU compliance.
Finally, here they are: the "big-patch" patches - merged into one big
patch (~1.5MB).
Sorry for the delay, but testing took much more time than I had expected
- esp. reworking the acpolish script triggered many more tiny issues
than I had expected (cf. below).
At least, now you've got something to spend your weekend with :-.
WARNINGS:
* I've gone a little (??) further than I had announced before.
* Several directories have been moved.
* Several files have been added and removed
* I have tested it with many BSPs/CPUs and a variety of permutiations of
configuration flags, but not with all.
* Most parts of the patch are automatically generated, however there are
many tiny manual modifications.
APPLYING THE PATCH:
./autogen -c
mkdir tools
mv c/src/exec/score/tools tools/cpu
mv c/build-tools tools/build
mv c/update-tools tools/update
patch -p1 -E < rtems-rc-19990709-0.diff
./autogen
If the patch doesn't apply to rtems-cvs, I would suggest that you should
try to apply it brute-force and then to run tools/update/rtems-polish.sh
-ac -am afterwards. A recursive diff between rtems-19990709 + patch and
rtems-cvs + patch then should report only a few dozen significant
changes to configuration files which need to be merged manually (IIRC, I
did not change any source files).
*** Attention: There are files to be removed, moved, copied and added
in/to CVS!
NEWS/CHANGES:
1. Configuration takes place in 3 stages: 1. per host (toplevel
configure script), 2. per target (c/configure), 3. per bsp
c/src/configure automatically triggered from ./configure and
c/Makefile.am.
2. Building of subdirectory c/ takes place in c/$(target_alias) for
cross-targets in c/ for native targets
3. Building of subdirectory c/src takes place in c/${target_alias}/<bsp>
for cross-targets, c/<bsp> for native targets
4. c/build-tools moved to tools/build
5. c/src/exec/score/cpu/tools moved to tools/cpu (=cpu-tools split out)
6. c/update-tools moved to tools/update
7. New subdirectory c/src/make, handles files from make/ on a per BSP
basis
8. Maintainer mode support: Ie. if configuring with
--enable-maintainer-mode disabled (the default), then tracking of many
dependencies will be disabled in Makefiles. Esp. many dependencies for
auto* generated files will be switched off in Makefiles. Ie. if not
using "--enable-maintainer-mode" many auto* generated files will not be
updated automatically, i.e. normal users should not be required to have
auto* tools anymore (untested).
9. Independent configuration scripts for / (toplevel), tools/build,
tools/cpu, tools/update, c/, c/src/, c/src/exec, c/src/lib, c/src/tests,
c/src/make
10. Automake support for all directories above and besides c/src
11. "preinstall" now is implemented as depth-first recursive make target
12. host compiled tools (exception bsp-tools) are accessed in location
in the build tree instead of inside the build-tree when building RTEMS.
13. RTEMS_ROOT and PROJECT_ROOT now point to directories inside the
build-tree - many tiny changes as consequence from this.
14. --with-cross-host support removed (offically announced obsolete by
cygnus)
15. Changing the order of building libraries below c/src/lib/
16. Former toplevel configure script broken into aclocal/*.m4 macros
17. Newlib now detected by configure macros, RTEMS_HAS_NEWLIB removed
from *cfg.
18. sptables.h now generated by autoconf
19. Rules for "mkinstalldirs temporary installation tree" moved from
c/Makefile to subdirectories.
20. Cpu-tools do not get installed.
21. FIX: Use ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS instead of ACLOCAL = -I ... in Makefile.ams
which are in directories with own configure scripts.
22. Hardcoding BSP names into libbsp/.../tools to avoid RTEMS_BSP get
overridden from the environment.
22. FIX: Handling of MP_PIECES in various Makefiles
23. FIX: Removing "::" rules from some Makefile.ins
24. FIX: File permission chaos: (-m 444 and -m 555 vs. -m 644 and -m
755) - Now all include files use -m 644.
25. Removed many gnumake-conditionals in Makefile.ins - Partially
replaced with automake-conditional, partially replaced with
conditionalized Makefile variables (... _yes_V)
26. Massively reworked acpolish: acpolish now parses Makefile.ins and
interprets parts of the Makefile.ins.
27. FIX: Some $(wildcard $(srcdir)/*.h) macros removed / replaced with
explicit lists of files in Makefile.ins.
28. FIX: Replacing MKLIB with RANLIB in Makefile.ins
29. HACK: Add preinstallation for pc386 specific
$(PROJECT_RELEASE)/BootImgs directory
... many more details, I can't recall
KNOWN BUGS:
1. make [debug|profile]_install do not do what they are promissing.
"make [debug|profile] install" does what "make [debug|profile]_install"
has been doing. Proposal: remove [debug|profile]_install
2. Dependencies between temporary installation tree and source tree are
not yet handled correctly.
3. Dependencies between temporary installation tree and source tree are
handled ineffencently (Using INSTALL_CHANGE instead of make
dependencies)
4. RTEMS_ROOT, PROJECT_ROOT, top_builddir, RTEMS_TOPdir now are
redundant.
5. The new configure scripts still are in their infancy. They contain
redundant checks and might still contain bugs, too.
6. RTEMS autoconf Makefile.ins use a mixture of configuration
information gathered in c/$(target_alias)/<bsp>/make and of information
collected from their configure scripts.
7. make dist is not fully functional
8. Subdirectory host-/build-/target- configure options (--target,
--host, --build) do not conform to Cygnus/GNU conventions.
9. Some RTEMS autoconf Makefile.in's makefile targets are not supported
in automake Makefile.ams/ins (e.g. get, clobber).
10. Some automake standard targets are not propagated from toplevel and
c/Makefile.am to autoconf subdirectories (eg. make dist).
11. rpcgen generated files are not part of the source-tree (Automake
conventions favor supplying generated files inside the source-tree,
however there is no support for rpcgen generated files in automake, cf.
yacc/lex support in automake).
12. RTEMS_HAS_RDBG handling is flaky. make/*.cfg use RTEMS_HAS_RDBG per
CPU, while librdb's sources can only be built per BSP. Raises the more
general question whether librdbg located correctly in the source-tree.
13. All make/*cfg files are configured per cpu, currently there is no
location to store per-bsp configuration information --> bsp.cfg, per
aconfig.h?
14. "make install" without having run "make all" beforehand does not
work.
15. handling of --enable-multiprocessing seems to be broken in
make/custom/*
16. Makefile.ins still exploit many gmake features.
17. File permisson chaos on libraries (no explict -m for
libraries/rels/etc).
18. mcp750 Makefiles are broken (Note: I *do* mean buggy - I am not
talking about "not-conforming to conventions", here :-).
19. Dependencies between configure scripts are not handled, eg. aborting
"make RTEMS_BSP=<bsp>" can leave the build-tree in an unusable state.
20. "make clean" does not delete <build-tree>/<bsp>. This is intentional
for now, because rerunning "make" after "make clean" requires an
explicit "make preinstall" afterwards now. This should be done
automatically, but doesn't work in this case for now. To work around
this problem <build-tree>/<bsp> is kept during "make clean" for now
(HACK).
TODO:
1. split out host-compiled bsp-tools
2. Use Cygnus/GNU standards for cross-compiling target-subdir
(CC=CC_FOR_TARGET .. configure --host=${target_alias}
--build=`config.guess'}), to be added to toplevel configure script after
splitting out bsp-tools.
3. Exploit per cpu support directory (c/src/<cpu>)- Splitting out
per-cpu libraries - Are there any?
4. Further automake support
5. Converting subdirectories into standalone / self-contained
subdirectories (Esp. moving their headers to the same common root as
their sources, eg. mv lib/include/rtems++
lib/librtems++/include/rtems++) - This is the main obstacle which
prevents moving further towards automake.
6. Propagating values from *.cfg into Makefiles instead of propagating
them at make time via Makefile-fragments (i.e. try to avoid using
*.cfg).
7. Testing on cygwin host (I *do* expect cygwin specific problems).
8. The ARCH in o-$(ARCH)-$(VARIANT) build-subdirectories is not needed
anymore.
GENERAL ISSUES:
1. Temporary installation tree -- Ian and I seem to disagree basically.
Though I think that I understand his argumentation, I do not share it.
IMO, his way of using the buildtree is mis-using the build-tree, relying
on an inofficial feature of RTEMS's current implementation, which
doesn't even work correctly in the current build-tree, though it
attempts hard to do so. From my very POV, it unnecessarily complicates
the structures of the source- and build-trees. It is not supported by
automake (No automatic generation for the necessary rules) and
complicates the transition to automake significantly (Generating the
rules with an enhanced version of acpolish could be possible).
As Ian correctly pointed out, here a management decision is needed -
though I don't see the need to draw this decision in short terms.
2. preinstallation generally is a sure means to spoil the structure of
the source tree, IMHO (No ranting intended, I am completly serious about
this one). eg. through tree dependencies. The worst problem related to
this I have found in the meantime is bsp_specs. bsp_specs is part of
libbsp, ie. there is *no* way to build *any* part of the source tree
*without* having a BSP *preinstalled*.
Note: This issue is related to issue 1., but is not identical - The
difference is the change of the order make rules have to be triggered.
While preinstallation triggers rules spread all over the source tree
before a "make all" can be run, a temporary installation tree could also
be installed by post "make all" hooks (all-local:, to be run after make
all in a directory is completed) if the directories' dependencies would
be a tree,
3. Stuctural dependencies between subdirectories.
4. Depth of the source tree (Prevents multilibbing and introduces many
unnecessary configure scripts).
5. per cpu vs. per bsp configuration (There are no real per-cpu parts
yets :-).
6. automake does not support $makefiles in AC_OUTPUT. Unlike before, we
now should try to avoid RTEMS_CHECK_MAKEFILE and to hard-code as much
paths to Makefiles as possible.
7. General redesign of the source tree
8. Main installation point - Changing it to ${prefix}/${target_alias}. ?
Besides item 8. (which is a must, IMHO), as far as I see most of them
can not be solved soon and will remain issues in the mid- to long-term
:-.
REMARKS:
* You (as the maintainer) should always use --enable-maintainer-mode
when building RTEMS to ensure that maintainer mode generated files (esp.
those in c/src/make) will be updated when make/* files have changed.
* Use @RTEMS_BSP@ in Makefile.ins and Makefile.ams below c/src/,
$(RTEMS_BSP) or ${RTEMS_BSP} will be overridden from environment
variables when using make RTEMS_BSP="....".
* c/src/make is a temporary cludge until configuration issues are
solved. At the moment it is configured per bsp, but contains
per-target/cpu info only. Its main purpose now is to circumvent
modifying make/*.cfg files, because I consider make/* to be frozen for
backward compatibilty.
* This patch should only affect configuration files. At least I do not
remember having touched any source files.
* To build the bare bsp you now need to mention it in --enable-rtemsbsp.
Example: building gensh1 and sh1/bare simultaneously:
../rtems-rc-19990709-1/configure --target=sh-rtems \
--enable-rtemsbsp="bare gensh1" \
--prefix=/tmp/rtems \
--enable-bare-cpu-cflags='-DMHZ=20 -m1
-DCPU_CONSOLE_DEVNAME=\"/dev/null\"' \
--enable-bare-cpu-model=sh7032 \
--enable-maintainer-mode \
--enable-cxx
make
make install
* The next steps in development would be to split out bsp-tools and then
to change to Cygnus/GNU canonicalization conventions for building the c/
subdirectory afterwards (i.e. many standard AC_*.m4 macros could be used
instead of customized versions)
FINAL REMARK:
The issues mentioned in the lists above sound much worser than the
situation actually is. Most of them are not specific to this patch, but
are also valid for the snapshot. I just wrote down what I came across
when working on the patch over the last few weeks.
I wouldn't be too surprised if you don't like the patch at the current
point in development. I am willing to discuss details and problems, I
also have no problem if you would post-pone applying this patch to times
after 4.1, but rejecting it as a whole for all times would be a false
management decision, IMHO.
Therefore I would suggest that you, if your time constaints allow it,
should at least play a little while with this patch to understand what
is going on and before drawing a decision on how to handle this
proposal. I know this patch is neither perfect nor complete, but I
consider it to be a major breakthrough. Don't be anxious because of the
size of the patch, the core of the patch is rather small, the size is
mainly the side effect of some systematic cleanups inside the Makefiles
(result of acpolish).
Feel free to ask if you encounter problems, if you don't understand
something or if you meet bugs - I am far from being perfect and am
prepared to answer them.
Ralf.
--
Ralf Corsepius
Forschungsinstitut fuer Anwendungsorientierte Wissensverarbeitung (FAW)
Helmholtzstr. 16, 89081 Ulm, Germany Tel: +49/731/501-8690
mailto:corsepiu@faw.uni-ulm.de FAX: +49/731/501-999
http://www.faw.uni-ulm.de
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
described in the message following this paragraph. This patch also includes
a mcp750 BSP.
From valette@crf.canon.fr Mon Jun 14 10:03:08 1999
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 01:30:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: VALETTE Eric <valette@crf.canon.fr>
To: joel@oarcorp.com
Cc: raguet@crf.canon.fr, rtems-snapshots@oarcorp.com, valette@crf.canon.fr
Subject: Questions/Suggestion regarding RTEMS PowerPC code (long)
Dear knowledgeable RTEMS powerpc users,
As some of you may know, I'm currently finalizing a port
of RTEMS on a MCP750 Motorola board. I have done most
of it but have some questions to ask before submitting
the port.
In order to understand some of the changes I have made
or would like to make, maybe it is worth describing the
MCP750 Motorola board.
the MCP750 is a COMPACT PCI powerpc board with :
1) a MPC750 233 MHz processor,
2) a raven bus bridge/PCI controller that
implement an OPENPIC compliant interrupt controller,
3) a VIA 82C586 PCI/ISA bridge that offers a PC
compliant IO for keyboard, serial line, IDE, and
the well known PC 8259 cascaded PIC interrupt
architecture model,
4) a DEC 21140 Ethernet controller,
5) the PPCBUG Motorola firmware in flash,
6) A DEC PCI bridge,
This architecture is common to most Motorola 60x/7xx
board except that :
1) on VME board, the DEC PCI bridge is replaced by
a VME chipset,
2) the VIA 82C586 PCI/ISA bridge is replaced by
another bridge that is almost fully compatible
with the via bridge...
So the port should be a rather close basis for many
60x/7xx motorola board...
On this board, I already have ported Linux 2.2.3 and
use it both as a development and target board.
Now the questions/suggestions I have :
1) EXCEPTION CODE
-------------------
As far as I know exceptions on PPC are handled like
interrupts. I dislike this very much as :
a) Except for the decrementer exception (and
maybe some other on mpc8xx), exceptions are
not recoverable and the handler just need to print
the full context and go to the firmware or debugger...
b) The interrupt switch is only necessary for the
decrementer and external interrupt (at least on
6xx,7xx).
c) The full context for exception is never saved and
thus cannot be used by debugger... I do understand
the most important for interrupts low level code
is to save the minimal context enabling to call C
code for performance reasons. On non recoverable
exception on the other hand, the most important is
to save the maximum information concerning proc status
in order to analyze the reason of the fault. At
least we will need this in order to implement the
port of RGDB on PPC
==> I wrote an API for connecting raw exceptions (and thus
raw interrupts) for mpc750. It should be valid for most
powerpc processors... I hope to find a way to make this coexist
with actual code layout. The code is actually located
in lib/libcpu/powerpc/mpc750 and is thus optional
(provided I write my own version of exec/score/cpu/powerpc/cpu.c ...)
See remark about files/directory layout organization in 4)
2) Current Implementation of ISR low level code
-----------------------------------------------
I do not understand why the MSR EE flags is cleared
again in exec/score/cpu/powerpc/irq_stubs.S
#if (PPC_USE_SPRG)
mfmsr r5
mfspr r6, sprg2
#else
lwz r6,msr_initial(r11)
lis r5,~PPC_MSR_DISABLE_MASK@ha
ori r5,r5,~PPC_MSR_DISABLE_MASK@l
and r6,r6,r5
mfmsr r5
#endif
Reading the doc, when a decrementer interrupt or an
external interrupt is active, the MSR EE flag is already
cleared. BTW if exception/interrupt could occur, it would
trash SRR0 and SRR1. In fact the code may be useful to set
MSR[RI] that re-enables exception processing. BTW I will need
to set other value in MSR to handle interrupts :
a) I want the MSR[IR] and MSR[DR] to be set for
performance reasons and also because I need DBAT
support to have access to PCI memory space as the
interrupt controller is in the PCI space.
Reading the code, I see others have the same kind of request :
/* SCE 980217
*
* We need address translation ON when we call our ISR routine
mtmsr r5
*/
This is just another prof that even the lowest level
IRQ code is fundamentally board dependent and
not simply processor dependent especially when
the processor use external interrupt controller
because it has a single interrupt request line...
Note that if you look at the PPC code high level interrupt
handling code, as the "set_vector" routine that really connects
the interrupt is in the BSP/startup/genpvec.c,
the fact that IRQ handling is BSP specific is DE-FACTO
acknowledged.
I know I have already expressed this and understand that this
would require some heavy change in the code but believe
me you will reach a point where you will not be able
to find a compatible while optimum implementation for low level
interrupt handling code...) In my case this is already true...
So please consider removing low level IRQ handling from
exec/score/cpu/* and only let there exception handling code...
Exceptions are usually only processor dependent and do
not depend on external hardware mechanism to be masked or
acknowledged or re-enabled (there are probably exception but ...)
I have already done this for pc386 bsp but need to make it again.
This time I will even propose an API.
3) R2/R13 manipulation for EABI implementation
----------------------------------------------
I do not understand the handling of r2 and r13 in the
EABI case. The specification for r2 says pointer to sdata2,
sbss2 section => constant. However I do not see -ffixed-r2
passed to any compilation system in make/custom/*
(for info linux does this on PPC).
So either this is a default compiler option when choosing
powerpc-rtems and thus we do not need to do anything with
this register as all the code is compiled with this compiler
and linked together OR this register may be used by rtems code
and then we do not need any special initialization or
handling.
The specification for r13 says pointer to the small data
area. r13 argumentation is the same except that as far
as I know the usage of the small data area requires
specific compiler support so that access to variables is
compiled via loading the LSB in a register and then
using r13 to get full address... It is like a small
memory model and it was present in IBM C compilers.
=> I propose to suppress any specific code for r2 and
r13 in the EABI case.
4) Code layout organization (yes again :-))
-------------------------------------------
I think there are a number of design flaws in the way
the code is for ppc organized and I will try to point them out.
I have been beaten by this again on this new port, and
was beaten last year while modifying code for pc386.
a) exec/score/cpu/* vs lib/libcpu/cpu/*.
I think that too many things are put in exec/score/cpu that
have nothing to do with RTEMS internals but are rather
related to CPU feature.
This include at least :
a) registers access routine (e.g GET_MSR_Value),
b) interrupt masking/unmasking routines,
c) cache_mngt_routine,
d) mmu_mngt_routine,
e) Routines to connect the raw_exception, raw_interrupt
handler,
b) lib/libcpu/cpu/powerpc/*
With a processor family as exuberant as the powerpc family,
and their well known subtle differences (604 vs 750) or
unfortunately majors (8xx vs 60x) the directory structure
is fine (except maybe the names that are not homogeneous)
powerpc
ppc421 mpc821 ...
I only needed to add mpc750. But the fact that libcpu.a was not
produced was a pain and the fact that this organization may
duplicates code is also problematic.
So, except if the support of automake provides a better solution
I would like to propose something like this :
powerpc
mpc421 mpc821 ... mpc750 shared wrapup
with the following rules :
a) "shared" would act as a source container for sources that may
be shared among processors. Needed files would be compiled inside
the processor specific directory using the vpath Makefile
mechanism. "shared" may also contain compilation code
for routine that are really shared and not worth to inline...
(did not found many things so far as registers access routine
ARE WORTH INLINING)... In the case something is compiled there,
it should create libcpushared.a
b) layout under processor specific directory is free provided
that
1)the result of the compilation process exports :
libcpu/powerpc/"PROC"/*.h in $(PROJECT_INCLUDE)/libcpu
2) each processor specific directory creates
a library called libcpuspecific.a
Note that this organization enables to have a file that
is nearly the same than in shared but that must differ
because of processor differences...
c) "wrapup" should create libcpu.a using libcpushared.a
libcpuspecific.a and export it $(PROJECT_INCLUDE)/libcpu
The only thing I have no ideal solution is the way to put shared
definitions in "shared" and only processor specific definition
in "proc". To give a concrete example, most MSR bit definition
are shared among PPC processors and only some differs. if we create
a single msr.h in shared it will have ifdef. If in msr.h we
include libcpu/msr_c.h we will need to have it in each prowerpc
specific directory (even empty). Opinions are welcomed ...
Note that a similar mechanism exist in libbsp/i386 that also
contains a shared directory that is used by several bsp
like pc386 and i386ex and a similar wrapup mechanism...
NB: I have done this for mpc750 and other processors could just use
similar Makefiles...
c) The exec/score/cpu/powerpc directory layout.
I think the directory layout should be the same than the
libcpu/powerpc. As it is not, there are a lot of ifdefs
inside the code... And of course low level interrupt handling
code should be removed...
Besides that I do not understand why
1) things are compiled in the wrap directory,
2) some includes are moved to rtems/score,
I think the "preinstall" mechanism enables to put
everything in the current directory (or better in a per processor
directory),
5) Interrupt handling API
-------------------------
Again :-). But I think that using all the features the PIC
offers is a MUST for RT system. I already explained in the
prologue of this (long and probably boring) mail that the MCP750
boards offers an OPENPIC compliant architecture and that
the VIA 82586 PCI/ISA bridge offers a PC compatible IO and
PIC mapping. Here is a logical view of the RAVEN/VIA 82586
interrupt mapping :
--------- 0 ------
| OPEN | <-----|8259|
| PIC | | | 2 ------
|(RAVEN)| | | <-----|8259|
| | | | | | 11
| | | | | | <----
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
--------- ------ | |
^ ------
| VIA PCI/ISA bridge
| x
-------- PCI interrupts
OPENPIC offers interrupt priorities among PCI interrupts
and interrupt selective masking. The 8259 offers the same kind
of feature. With actual powerpc interrupt code :
1) there is no way to specify priorities among
interrupts handler. This is REALLY a bad thing.
For me it is as importnat as having priorities
for threads...
2) for my implementation, each ISR should
contain the code that acknowledge the RAVEN
and 8259 cascade, modify interrupt mask on both
chips, and reenable interrupt at processor level,
..., restore then on interrupt return,.... This code
is actually similar to code located in some
genpvec.c powerpc files,
3) I must update _ISR_Nesting_level because
irq.inl use it...
4) the libchip code connects the ISR via set_vector
but the libchip handler code does not contain any code to
manipulate external interrupt controller hardware
in order to acknoledge the interrupt or re-enable
them (except for the target hardware of course)
So this code is broken unless set_vector adds an
additionnal prologue/epilogue before calling/returning
from in order to acknoledge/mask the raven and the
8259 PICS... => Anyway already EACH BSP MUST REWRITE
PART OF INTERRUPT HANDLING CODE TO CORRECTLY IMPLEMENT
SET_VECTOR.
I would rather offer an API similar to the one provided
in libbsp/i386/shared/irq/irq.h so that :
1) Once the driver supplied methods is called the
only things the ISR has to do is to worry about the
external hardware that triggered the interrupt.
Everything on openpic/VIA/processor would have been
done by the low levels (same things as set-vector)
2) The caller will need to supply the on/off/isOn
routine that are fundamental to correctly implements
debuggers/performance monitoring is a portable way
3) A globally configurable interrupt priorities
mechanism...
I have nothing against providing a compatible
set_vector just to make libchip happy but
as I have already explained in other
mails (months ago), I really think that the ISR
connection should be handled by the BSP and that no
code containing irq connection should exist the
rtems generic layers... Thus I really dislike
libchip on this aspect because in a long term
it will force to adopt the less reach API
for interrupt handling that exists (set_vector).
Additional note : I think the _ISR_Is_in_progress()
inline routine should be :
1) Put in a processor specific section,
2) Should not rely on a global variable,
As :
a) on symmetric MP, there is one interrupt level
per CPU,
b) On processor that have an ISP (e,g 68040),
this variable is useless (MSR bit testing could
be used)
c) On PPC, instead of using the address of the
variable via __CPU_IRQ_info.Nest_level a dedicated
SPR could be used.
NOTE: most of this is also true for _Thread_Dispatch_disable_level
END NOTE
--------
Please do not take what I said in the mail as a criticism for
anyone who submitted ppc code. Any code present helped me
a lot understanding PPC behavior. I just wanted by this
mail to :
1) try to better understand the actual code,
2) propose concrete ways of enhancing current code
by providing an alternative implementation for MCP750. I
will make my best effort to try to brake nothing but this
is actually hard due to the file layout organisation.
3) make understandable some changes I will probably make
if joel let me do them :-)
Any comments/objections are welcomed as usual.
--
__
/ ` Eric Valette
/-- __ o _. Canon CRF
(___, / (_(_(__ Rue de la touche lambert
35517 Cesson-Sevigne Cedex
FRANCE
Tel: +33 (0)2 99 87 68 91 Fax: +33 (0)2 99 84 11 30
E-mail: valette@crf.canon.fr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This one is an enhancement to acpolish.
It replaces some Makefile variables by others variable in Makefile.ins
(tries to use unique name for some variables). It therefore eases
parsing Makefile.ins for further automatic Makefile.in conversions in
future.
To apply:
cd <rtems-source-tree>
sh <path-to>/rtems-rc-19990407-8.sh
./autogen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch is the most scary of all proposals I've been mailing to you
this week until now.
It consists of 3 parts:
1. a patch
2. a perl script (acpolish)
3. a shell script wrapper to invoke the perl-script.
The perl-script reads in each Makefile.in and modifies them
("polishes/beautifies" them :-).
These modifications are not easy to describe:
Basically, it hard-codes some automake Makefile-variables and rules into
RTEMS autoconf-Makefile.ins (Note: autoconf vs. automake!!) and converts
some settings/variables to configure scripts' requirements (Yes,
plural).
E.g. it adds the automake standard variables $top_builddir and $subdir,
adds dependency rules for automatic re-generation of Makefiles from
Makefile.in, adds support variables for relative paths to multiple
configure scripts etc.
The patch is a one-line patch to enable the support of the new features
added by acpolish.
The shell script is a wrapper which pokes around inside of the source
tree for Makefile.ins and invokes acpolish on all autoconf-Makefile.ins.
acpolish is designed to be able to run several times on the same
Makefile.in and may once become a more general tool to convert RTEMS
Makefile.in to automake. Therefore, I'd like to keep it inside of source
tree. (e.g. as contrib/acpolish or c/update-tools/acpolish). However, it
doesn't make sense to export it outside of RTEMS.
To apply this:
cd <source-tree>
patch -p1 -E < <path-to-patch>/rtems-rc-19990318-1.diff
tar xzvf <path-to>/rtems-rc-polish.tar.gz
./rtems-polish.sh
./autogen
Note: The path contrib/acpolish is hard-coded into rtems-polish.sh, if
you decide to put it in an alternative place, please modify
rtems-polish.sh to reflect this change.
Later:
cvs rm make/rtems.cfg (It isn't used anymore)
cvs add contrib
cvs add contrib/acpolish
cvs commit
I've tested this intensively, but naturally I can't exclude bugs.
Ralf.
PS.: Most probably, this is the last "Towards automake" patch. The next
one probably will be a real automake patch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
First, the unlimited patch. I have compiled the unlmited patch for the
Linux posix BSP only and it seems to work cleanly. I would like a really
major application run on this change before commiting as the changes are
very core and significant. I am currently building all the tests to run.
I have no targets suitable to test on at the moment.
I have tested the patch for inline functions and macros.
Turning macros on has found some core bugs. I have fixed these but have
not run all the tests. Please review the patch for these changes. They
are:
1) The conditional compilation for MP support broke the core messages
code. You cannot embed a conditional macro in another macro. The Send
and Urgent Send calls are macros.
2) User extensions handler initialisation now has two parameters. I have
updated the macros to support the extra parameter.
The patch also contains the gcc-target-default.cfg fix required to build
the kernel. More of a by product than a fix for you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
> 5) rtems-rc-19990202-1.diff/reorg-install.sh
>
> reorg-install.sh fixes a Makefile variable name clash of RTEMS
> configuration files and automake/autoconf standards.
> Until now, RTEMS used $(INSTALL) for install-if-change. Automake and
> autoconf use $(INSTALL) for a bsd-compatible install. As
> install-if-change and bsd-install are not compatible, I renamed all
> references to install-if-changed to $(INSTALL_CHANGED) and used
> $(INSTALL) for bsd-install (==automake/autoconf standard). When
> automake will be introduced install-if-change will probably be replaced
> by $(INSTALL) and therefore will slowly vanish. For the moment, this
> patch fixes a very nasty problem which prevents adding any automake file
> until now (There are still more).
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
automake:
Notes:
* I didn't yet touch the cpu subdirectory. I still need some time to
think on how to handle them.
* I probably will wait for the next snapshot before mailing more patches
(I still have some pending), giving you a chance to apply them and me a
chance to become target of the bullets which will probably be aimed at
me after these modifications.
|
|
|
|
| |
it work.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
not a valid object class. This was discovered while looking for
a bug reported by Jennifer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to multiple. This lets the stack check extension be installed
at system initialization time and avoids the BSP having to
even know about its existence.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Here is the result of my nightly work to get RTEMS_ROOT=$srcdir working
with different shells and relative/absolute paths.
What I did is relatively simple in principle:
Instead of setting RTEMS_ROOT in configure.in and then let configure
substitute @RTEMS_ROOT@ inside the Makefiles, I now let each Makefile
set RTEMS_ROOT from each Makefile's @top_srcdir@ value.
The difference is subtile, but with enormous side effects:
- If RTEMS_ROOT is set in configure, then the same single value will be
propagated to all Makefiles. This breaks using relative paths, as the
relative path to the root of the source tree is used inside of all
subdirectory Makefiles.
- Now each Makefile.in sets RTEMS_ROOT = @top_srcdir@. top_srcdir is
computed individually by configure for each single Makefile.in, hereby
receiving the correct value, no matter if relative or absolute paths are
used.
To get this working, I needed to remove setting RTEMS_ROOT from
target.cfg.in, because this overrides the value of RTEMS_ROOT from each
individual Makefile.
Furthermore, I removed RTEMS_CUSTOM from the Makefiles and replaced all
"include $(RTEMS_CUSTOM)" directives with"include
$(RTEMS_ROOT)/make/custom/$(RTEMS_BSP)". Perhaps you don't like this,
but I think, to have one variable less is clearer and easier to
understand than having several variables refering to the next one.
I enclose a small patch to this mail, which
- fixes the config.h problem (to finally clearify misunderstands)
- removes assignment/subsitution of RTEMS_ROOT from configure.in
- contains a workaround for the application Makefile's RTEMS_ROOT
problem (reported by Eric)
- removes some unused lines from the toplevel Makefile.in
- removes assignment of RTEMS_ROOT from make/target.cfg.in
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
any directory in the build tree. The only variable which must be set
before the command "gmake" is invoked is RTEMS_BSP (e.g. RTEMS_BSP=erc32).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to lib/include.
Went to using a PROJECT_INCLUDE variable.
|
|
|
|
| |
of switching to the modified GNU GPL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
GNU autoconf. This is the first large step in allowing an RTEMS
user to perform a one-tree build (per crossgcc FAQ) including RTEMS
in the build process. With this change RTEMS is configured in
built in the same style as the GNU tools, yet retains the basic
structure of its traditional Makefiles (ala Tony Bennett).
Jiri Gaisler (jgais@wd.estec.esa.nl) deserves (and received)
a big thank you for doing this.
There are still issues to be resolved but as of this commit, all target
which can be built on a linux host have been using a modified version
of the source Jiri submitted. This source was merged and most targets
built in the tree before this commit.
There are some issues which remain to be resolved but they are primarily
related to host OS dependencies, script issues, the use of gawk
for hack_specs, and the dependence on gcc snapshots. These will
be resolved.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Handler could timestamp the starting and stopping of timers. Since
TOD is built on top of Watchdog, this avoided a circular dependency.
|
| |
|