summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/c/src/exec/posix/include/rtems/posix/priority.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--c/src/exec/posix/include/rtems/posix/priority.h44
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 44 deletions
diff --git a/c/src/exec/posix/include/rtems/posix/priority.h b/c/src/exec/posix/include/rtems/posix/priority.h
deleted file mode 100644
index c0253f3bab..0000000000
--- a/c/src/exec/posix/include/rtems/posix/priority.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
-/*
- *
- *
- * $Id$
- */
-
-#ifndef __RTEMS_POSIX_PRIORITY_h
-#define __RTEMS_POSIX_PRIORITY_h
-
-#include <rtems/score/priority.h>
-
-/*
- * 1003.1b-1993,2.2.2.80 definition of priority, p. 19
- *
- * "Numericallly higher values represent higher priorities."
- *
- * Thus, RTEMS Core has priorities run in the opposite sense of the POSIX API.
- *
- * There are only 254 posix priority levels since a task at priority level
- * 255 would never run because of the RTEMS idle task. This is necessary
- * because GNAT maps the lowest Ada task priority to the lowest thread
- * priority. The lowest priority Ada task should get to run, so there is
- * a fundamental conflict with having 255 priorities.
- */
-
-#define POSIX_SCHEDULER_MAXIMUM_PRIORITY (254)
-
-#define POSIX_SCHEDULER_MINIMUM_PRIORITY (1)
-
-RTEMS_INLINE_ROUTINE boolean _POSIX_Priority_Is_valid(
- int priority
-);
-
-RTEMS_INLINE_ROUTINE Priority_Control _POSIX_Priority_To_core(
- int priority
-);
-
-RTEMS_INLINE_ROUTINE int _POSIX_Priority_From_core(
- Priority_Control priority
-);
-
-#include <rtems/posix/priority.inl>
-
-#endif