summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/cpukit/score/src/smp.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de>2019-12-13 06:18:36 +0100
committerSebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de>2020-02-04 06:06:41 +0100
commiteea21eaca117ecd98afea164e1808d6530ef487f (patch)
treeca4e15da28b71a5ecca5fc357798261a39b3f250 /cpukit/score/src/smp.c
parentbsps: Remove uses of BSP_GET_WORK_AREA_DEBUG (diff)
downloadrtems-eea21eaca117ecd98afea164e1808d6530ef487f.tar.bz2
bsps: Rework work area initialization
The work area initialization was done by the BSP through bsp_work_area_initialize(). This approach predated the system initialization through the system initialization linker set. The workspace and C program heap were unconditionally initialized. The aim is to support RTEMS application configurations which do not need the workspace and C program heap. In these configurations, the workspace and C prgram heap should not get initialized. Change all bsp_work_area_initialize() to implement _Memory_Get() instead. Move the dirty memory, sbrk(), per-CPU data, workspace, and malloc() heap initialization into separate system initialization steps. This makes it also easier to test the individual initialization steps. This change adds a dependency to _Heap_Extend() to all BSPs. This dependency will be removed in a follow up change. Update #3838.
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--cpukit/score/src/smp.c42
1 files changed, 42 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/cpukit/score/src/smp.c b/cpukit/score/src/smp.c
index 306d1ea4b4..b6394a8bdf 100644
--- a/cpukit/score/src/smp.c
+++ b/cpukit/score/src/smp.c
@@ -20,9 +20,14 @@
#include <rtems/score/smpimpl.h>
#include <rtems/score/assert.h>
+#include <rtems/score/memory.h>
+#include <rtems/score/percpudata.h>
#include <rtems/score/schedulerimpl.h>
#include <rtems/score/threadimpl.h>
#include <rtems/config.h>
+#include <rtems/sysinit.h>
+
+#include <string.h>
#if CPU_USE_DEFERRED_FP_SWITCH == TRUE
#error "deferred FP switch not implemented for SMP"
@@ -252,3 +257,40 @@ void _SMP_Send_message_multicast(
}
}
}
+
+static void _Per_CPU_Data_initialize( void )
+{
+ uintptr_t size;
+
+ size = RTEMS_LINKER_SET_SIZE( _Per_CPU_Data );
+
+ if ( size > 0 ) {
+ const Memory_Information *mem;
+ Per_CPU_Control *cpu;
+ uint32_t cpu_index;
+ uint32_t cpu_max;
+
+ mem = _Memory_Get();
+ cpu = _Per_CPU_Get_by_index( 0 );
+ cpu->data = RTEMS_LINKER_SET_BEGIN( _Per_CPU_Data );
+
+ cpu_max = rtems_configuration_get_maximum_processors();
+
+ for ( cpu_index = 1 ; cpu_index < cpu_max ; ++cpu_index ) {
+ cpu = _Per_CPU_Get_by_index( cpu_index );
+ cpu->data = _Memory_Allocate( mem, size, CPU_CACHE_LINE_BYTES );
+
+ if( cpu->data == NULL ) {
+ _Internal_error( INTERNAL_ERROR_NO_MEMORY_FOR_PER_CPU_DATA );
+ }
+
+ memcpy( cpu->data, RTEMS_LINKER_SET_BEGIN( _Per_CPU_Data ), size);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+RTEMS_SYSINIT_ITEM(
+ _Per_CPU_Data_initialize,
+ RTEMS_SYSINIT_PER_CPU_DATA,
+ RTEMS_SYSINIT_ORDER_MIDDLE
+);