score: Remove CPU_PARTITION_ALIGNMENT

Use the CPU_SIZEOF_POINTER alignment instead.  The internal alignment
requirement is defined by the use of Chain_Node (consisting of two
pointers) to manage the free chain of partitions.

It seems that previously the condition

  CPU_PARTITION_ALIGNMENT >= sizeof(Chain_Node)

was true on all CPU ports.  Now, we need an additional check.

Update #3482.

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 18 deletions

diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/no_cpu/include/rtems/score/cpu.h b/cpukit/score/cpu/no_cpu/include/rtems/score/cpu.h
index 7327dff610..427e381582 100644
--- a/cpukit/score/cpu/no_cpu/include/rtems/score/cpu.h
+++ b/cpukit/score/cpu/no_cpu/include/rtems/score/cpu.h
@@ -597,24 +597,6 @@ extern Context_Control_fp _CPU_Null_fp_context;
 #define CPU_HEAP_ALIGNMENT         CPU_ALIGNMENT
 
 /**
- * This number corresponds to the byte alignment requirement for memory
- * buffers allocated by the partition manager.  This alignment requirement
- * may be stricter than that for the data types alignment specified by
- * @ref CPU_ALIGNMENT.  It is common for the partition to follow the same
- * alignment requirement as @ref CPU_ALIGNMENT.  If the @ref CPU_ALIGNMENT is
- * strict enough for the partition, then this should be set to
- * @ref CPU_ALIGNMENT.
- *
- * NOTE:  This does not have to be a power of 2.  It does have to
- *        be greater or equal to than @ref CPU_ALIGNMENT.
- *
- * Port Specific Information:
- *
- * XXX document implementation including references if appropriate
- */
-#define CPU_PARTITION_ALIGNMENT    CPU_ALIGNMENT
-
-/**
  * This number corresponds to the byte alignment requirement for the
  * stack.  This alignment requirement may be stricter than that for the
  * data types alignment specified by @ref CPU_ALIGNMENT.  If the