diff options
| author | Chris Johns <chrisj@rtems.org> | 2016-02-26 18:22:07 +1100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Amar Takhar <verm@darkbeer.org> | 2016-05-02 20:51:26 -0400 |
| commit | fa70fd20878e402610c263f129266593d31a0376 (patch) | |
| tree | c609d33c7047b975cfe8e0ac0df020fb26dae255 /posix_users/status_of_implementation.rst | |
| parent | Update the shell user's guide top level. (diff) | |
| download | rtems-docs-fa70fd20878e402610c263f129266593d31a0376.tar.bz2 | |
POSIX User clean up.
Diffstat (limited to '')
| -rw-r--r-- | posix_users/status_of_implementation.rst | 5 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/posix_users/status_of_implementation.rst b/posix_users/status_of_implementation.rst index 7f535f0..e372f42 100644 --- a/posix_users/status_of_implementation.rst +++ b/posix_users/status_of_implementation.rst @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ are provided and do work in a coherent manner. This is significant when porting existing code from UNIX to RTEMS. - Implementation + - The current implementation of ``dup()`` is insufficient. - FIFOs ``mkfifo()`` are not currently implemented. - Asynchronous IO is not implemented. @@ -21,16 +22,17 @@ when porting existing code from UNIX to RTEMS. - getc/putc unlocked family is not implemented - Shared Memory is not implemented - Mapped Memory is not implemented - - NOTES: - For Shared Memory and Mapped Memory services, it is unclear what level of support is appropriate and possible for RTEMS. - Functional Testing + - Tests for unimplemented services - Performance Testing + - There are no POSIX Performance Tests. - Documentation @@ -40,4 +42,3 @@ when porting existing code from UNIX to RTEMS. background and operations sections. - Example programs (not just tests) would be very nice. - |